SMART TALK
by Dr. Perse Nickety
WATERS: At the Center for English as a First Language, I started as a research fellow. One of my favorite projects was tracing the origin of the gratuitous use of
waters. As a bonus, I might formulate a guide to its proper use. To the best of my knowledge, this has never been done.
For a basic reference, I turned to the
Oxford English Dictionary, which devotes pages to
water with no separate entry for
waters, as if it doesn't deserve acknowledgement as a real word.
However,
waters is covered in the entries for
water, and its uses tend to fall into three main categories. First, "The plural is often used...with reference to flowing water or to water moving in waves." I had never noticed this. The raging
waters of the Atlantic, the
waters of the Hudson and all that.
I'd prefer
the raging Atlantic and
the Hudson, having been taught that simple language is better language. We know the Atlantic and the Hudson are made of water, thank you very much.
Waters also tends to get used "in a figurative context," says the OED. To me, that means when you want to sound poetic. Spare me. Speak plain English, please.
And third,
waters is often used to refer to "the seas and oceans in a particular quarter of the globe." Quarter? Why quarter? Why not "the
waters of the world?
Which leads me to a proposal for a guideline. Let's make water/waters analogous to people/peoples and fish/fishes. Why not? Use
waters to refer to more than one distinct body of
water.
Otherwise, it's all
water under the bridge.
v9i19