Pin It
On May 15 Lansing voters will vote on whether to approve a $22,094,333 and elect two school board members from among three candidates.  Dan Brown will retire from the Board Of Education when his current term is finished, and Christine Iacobucci's second term on the board is also up.  Iacobucci is running again against David Dittman and Gina Lord Shattuck.  This year the election is important because the board is faced with many challenges, not the least of which is a taxpayer base that has lost its trust and confidence in the district.

Image
Gina Lord Shattuck
Click on the candidate above to read his or her interview
or click here to see all three on the Elections page
(NOTE: Over the weekend Gina Lord Shattuck withdrew from the
race for personal reasons.)
Last year's budget failed in the first vote, then a slightly reduced version passed.  Early this year taxpayers voted down a school capital project.  This year the tax rate will be 7.4% higher than last year, in part because the board is running out of reserves to draw from, and in part because of an error last year in which spending did not meet projected levels, reducing the amount of State aid that came into the district.

All three candidates either have or have had children in the Lansing schools.  Iacobucci has lived here for 18 years, and currently has a child in each of Lansing's three schools, as well as a son in college.  Dittman has lived here for 16 years, and his two grown daughters attended the middle and high schools.  Shattuck has lived in Lansing four years, and has a son in middle school, and a daughter in high school.

All the candidates have volunteered their time to participate in the school district.  Iacobucci is finishing her second term on the board.  Shattuck has served on quite a few committees and task forces since she moved here, including the District Shared Decision Making committee and the Policy Board.  Dittman participated on the Capital Project Facilities Committee.  All three work in some aspect of education, with Dittman teaching accounting at the Cornell hotel school. Shattuck is the Employee Benefits Manager at TST Boces.  Iacobucci teaches sociology at Wells College.

Taking Attendance

A number of people have remarked that Christine Iacobucci has missed about 40% of meetings.  Iacobucci told us in her interview that she was sure she had attended at least 70% of them.  "You know it’s one of those things where face time can be misleading," she added. "There are other preparatory kinds of work that board members do behind the scenes for preparation for any of the issues that are going on in the district that are sort of behind the scenes."

To clarify the issue, we checked the minutes.  While she shares the worst meeting attendance record with fellow member Dan Brown, the 65.2% of meetings she has made during the current school year is statistically close to the 70% she claimed in her interview, and about as close to the 40% that others have suggested.

Iacobucci noted in her interview that she missed two meetings over the summer due to vacation.  If you discount those two meetings, the percentage rises to 71.4%, just what she estimated.  That amounts to to missing close to 1/3 of the meetings.

Board Of Education Attendence

DB SD AD CI TK BL GS
20-Jul 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10-Jul 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
24-Jul 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
31-Jul 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
14-Aug 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
24-Aug 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
14-Sep 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
27-Sep 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
5-Oct 1 1 1 0 1 1 0
12-Oct 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
26-Oct 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
2-Nov 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
16-Nov 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
30-Nov 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
14-Dec 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
11-Jan 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
23-Jan 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
25-Jan 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
29-Jan 1 1 1 0 0 1 0
8-Feb 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1-Mar 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
22-Mar 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
4-Apr 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
Totals 15 21 21 15 19 23 18
Percent 65.2 91.3 91.3 65.2 82.6 100 78.3

Abbreviations: DB=Dan Brown; SD=Sandi Dhimitri; AD=Anne Drake; CI= Christine Iacobucci, TK=Tom Keane; BL=Bonita Lindberg; GS=Glenn Swanson

The three have different personal styles.  Thoughtful and solution-oriented, Shattuck says she is a team player.  Dittman cuts to the core of issues, demanding to understand the rationale and effect of decisions before committing resources to them.  Often confrontational, Iacobucci says she feels a strong sense of duty to raise questions.

While all of the candidates believe there are problems to be addressed, they all say that Lansing's teachers and staff are second to none.  All are pleased with the education their children got or are getting, and they give a lot of credit to the teachers.

Over the past two weeks the Star interviewed all three candidates.  Each was asked the same questions, with slight modifications because Iacobucci is an incumbent with a two-term record, while the others will be new to the Board Of Education if elected.  

We have ordered the interviews in the same order that they will appear on the May 15 ballot.  This order was determined by drawing the three names out of a hat at a recent school board meeting.

In our election coverage we allow the candidates to speak in their own words, transcribing the recorded interviews with minor edits: we remove the 'ums' and repetitive 'I thinks,' and occasionally move a block of the conversation up or down so that it flows better to make more sense to the reader.  Other that that what you read is the candidates words as spoken.

Next Tuesday (May 8th) all three will participate in a 'Meet the Candidates' night at 7pm in the high school cafeteria.  The three will answer questions submitted by the public in a moderated session sponsored by the Parent Teacher Student Organization (PTSO).  With the Lansing district facing tough challenges as it struggles to maintain its high academic standards and its reputation as a great school system, the PTSO hopes for a good turnout so voters can evaluate for themselves which candidates are best suited to meet these challenges over the next three years.

----
v3i17
Pin It